AI SEND / EHCP Tribunal Evidence Pack Builder for UK Parents

Hannah is thirty-nine, a part-time HR coordinator from Stockport with a nine-year-old son, Eli, who is autistic and has a working memory in the second percentile. She has been fighting her local authority for sixteen months. She filed for an EHC needs assessment last spring, was refused, mediated, was refused again, and finally — in November — got a draft EHCP that she described in her support group as "a creative writing exercise." Section B says her son "presents with mild communication difficulties." Section F says he needs "differentiated work and access to a quiet space where appropriate." Hannah has reports from a private educational psychologist, a speech and language therapist, two specialist teaching assessments, and a stack of school incident logs going back two years that all say something completely different. She has eight weeks to file her SEND35 appeal. She has tried IPSEA's helpline four times this week — engaged. She has read the SEND37 guide twice. She has a 47-tab Chrome window open. Her partner has stopped asking how it's going.

She gets a quote from a SEND solicitor on Tuesday: £750 to review the draft and write the grounds, £2,400 if they prepare the bundle. She doesn't have it. She is staring at a Word document called Working Document v3 FINAL.docx at 10:47pm when an article in her Facebook group mentions a new tool — EvidenceDeck. She uploads her draft EHCP, her psych reports, her school logs. Twelve minutes later there's a working document highlighting every paragraph in Section F that's "vague" or "unquantified," a witness statement structured around her own evidence, an evidence index that maps every claim to a numbered exhibit, and a calendar of every SEND7 deadline up to her hearing date. She pays £79 for the full pack. For the first time in a year she sleeps through the night.